Does the news upset you? Me, too.
Recently I reflected on my responses to two people who were talking about how certain news items were affecting them, and I realized that what I said to them was what I, myself, needed to hear:
Whatever outrage we feel should be directed toward productive change within our means. Otherwise it just simmers with no outlet, and that harms us.
Of course we’re going to be upset over many of the things happening in the world. I don’t think it’s healthy to simply shrug off instances of gun violence like the racist attack in Buffalo, New York, and the anti-Taiwanese attack in California the following day. (As I wrote the first draft of this post, news was breaking about about yet another mass shooting, this one at an elementary school in Texas.)
But simply allowing the news to upset us doesn’t do anyone any good.
So what should we do?
First, we should ask ourselves: Is the thing that is upsetting me one of my priorities?
If the answer is “yes,” then it’s time to take action.
But what if the answer is “no”?
First, we can ask ourselves if we need to reshuffle our priorities. I’ve recently done that. While I’m still concerned about slavery, these days I’m even more concerned about climate change and voting rights, so I’m channeling more of my energy to those issues and significantly less to anti-slavery activities. I still try to keep slavery in mind as I make purchasing decisions. If someone asked me to throw an anti-slavery chocolate party, I’d still try to say “yes.” But I devote much less attention to it now, simply because I can’t tackle everything.
If your priorities haven’t changed but you still want to act on an upsetting piece of news, you might decide to act in a small way, such as dashing off a letter to the editor. Or, if you have the capacity (I suspect few of us do, so please be honest with yourself about this), you can add this new issue to your priorities.
And if you don’t have the capacity to add yet another priority and can’t think of a small, achievable way that you can make a difference, it’s time to change tactics.
When taking action isn’t realistic, it’s time to let it go.
There’s nothing wrong with picking up a book, calling a friend, or otherwise engaging in some form of escape.
“Escapism” is often used negatively, and certainly it can be unhealthy to cope with the news by downing a bottle of wine or spending all of your time in a fantasy world. But I believe that escaping into a good story or a favorite hobby is far better than spending unproductive time seething over something you can’t change. An escape can distract us and, even better, it can recharge us, possibly giving us the break we need to be able to move beyond outrage to action.
The world is full of upsetting news. It’s easy to let ourselves dwell on our outrage and our fear for the future.
But it’s more productive and better for us to keep these things in mind:
- I can do something, even if it’s small, to make a difference.
- I can’t do everything. If I try, I’ll just end up being ineffective.
- When I’m physically or emotionally exhausted, or when I’m upset by a situation I can’t change, it’s a good idea to let it go and do something that makes me happy instead. I don’t need to ignore the bad news, but I may need a break.
Addendum on 5/25/22: How I Followed My Own Advice
Readers may be interested in knowing what I did after I published this post yesterday.
Knowing that gun control is not one of my top priorities but that I wanted to take some sort of action, I reached out to my two senators and my representative and asked them to prioritize gun control legislation before people forget the tragedies that have happened this month.
Then I walked away from my computer and made dinner while listening to The Silmarillion.
I may write about gun control in a future blog post — it’s something I’ve entertained off and on for a while. But for now, I’ve taken a small, practical action and avoided simply stewing in my emotions.
6 replies on “What Should We Do When the News Is Upsetting?”
Nice piece Kate. And worth stepping back to do exactly as you suggest.
Thanks, Robert!
That was a good piece of writing and I needed it today. Many things I cannot change, but global warming is a big one for me and I will do my best to become more involved.
Thanks, Sara!
This is another very helpful posting, Kate. Well done! You are right on so many points.
The world is a very BIG place, with very bad things happening almost everywhere. You would only have to look at another continent to realise that your own local news, including so-called international news, is (unavoidably) very selective. Supposedly newsworthy events outside our own region have to be BIG to be reported.
As an example, writing in Australia, I have access to my state capital newspapers, and the one national newspaper, all of which tend to report only (supposed) major items regarding my state capital, my state, and my country, plus major global issues.
This is parallel with TV news broadcasts that are similarly selective. My state capital free-to-air commercial TV channels report, more or less, what is in the newspapers. My free-to-air non-commercial national TV news channel reports slightly more widely. I also have access to a national TV channel that deliberately takes a global, multicultural, multilingual stance (in contrast to the mainstream English-language focus of the other TV channels), and this reports more diversely.
Then there are also global issues reported by National Geographic, with e-mail bulletins.
And then I could deliberately look more widely, and try to find, for example, news from Myanmar/Burma, or almost anywhere in Africa, or ask what China is doing to Uyghers/Uigars, and other non-Han ethnic minorities, …
In short, if I started looking for bad news I would very (very!) quickly find more than I could mentally and emotionally handle!
If we are to have the strength to do good in our own part of the world, we need to be mentally strong, and the only way we can do that is by selective focus, supported by accepting the reality that we cannot do good everywhere.
This is, of course, me repeating what you have already said, clearly and practically. I am endorsing your remarks.
Having said that, I am mindful of Simone Weil, the notable French philosopher and mystic, who seems to have cared so much about the world (especially living through the Second World War and its global horrors) that she was unable to take enough care of herself, and eventually wore her body out.
(The nature of Simone Weil’s death is contentious, but I think it can be taken as a warning to face the suffering of the world with personal humility and acceptance of our own limits:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simone_Weil)
Voltaire’s satire “Candide” explored the personal challenge of bad things happening, and concluded that, metaphorically, we must tend our own garden.
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candide)
Keep up the good work, and stay strong!
John
Thank you so much, John!
I love what you say about world news. I have an uncle who shares news about Venezuela with me (much of it from the BBC); if he didn’t, I’d know very little about what is going on there, particularly about the refugee crisis that has been caused by conditions in Venezuela. That is a priority for him, and I’m glad I’m learning about it and that he is doing what he can, however little, to try to help. But, while I have (I hope) assured him that I appreciate the stories he sends my way, I need to focus my own energies for change on other issues.
I admire you for how widely read you are. Simone Weil is someone I know of (just a little — I didn’t know anything about how she’d died) but have yet to read (yet another person on my “to read” list). I really should prioritize her given discussions I’ve had with my spiritual director about “Mystery.”
I always enjoy hearing from you, so again: thank you!