Categories
Make a Difference

Make a Difference: Participate in Red Sand Project

Red Sand Project Installation
My Second Installation for Red Sand Project

Red Sand Project was started by artist Molly Gochman to draw attention to slavery. It consists primarily of “sidewalk interventions” — art installations made by people who sign up to participate. When you register, you receive two bags of red sand, which can be used to fill sidewalk cracks. The sand is a reminder to people that, as Gochman puts it, “we can’t merely walk over the most marginalized people in our communities.” Participants are encouraged to take pictures of their installations and post them on social media using #redsandproject.

Because I am particularly concerned about human trafficking, I requested sand and created two installations — one near my workplace and one near my home. I wrote #redsandproject in chalk near my installations in order to encourage people to learn more on social media, and I posted photos of them on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. I felt odd while I was creating the installations; although no one approached me to ask what I was doing, and if they had done so, it would have been an opportunity to talk about slavery, I was worried that someone would confront me as if I were committing an act of vandalism. Still, I’m always happy for a chance to educate people about modern-day slavery, so I was glad to find another way to do this.

A larger scale part of the project is an installation in Houston, Texas, called “Border, US|MX.” It was initially a 2-foot wide, 300-foot long trench filled with red sand. It has since been built up into a three-foot high grass-covered earthwork.

Consider taking some time to learn more about the project and to request your own bags of sand. You’ll be joining people around the world who are working together to draw more attention to human trafficking.

Categories
Something Wonderful

Something Wonderful: A Wrinkle in Time – When You Reach Me – Breadcrumbs

Picture of books

I love cultural “breadcrumbs” in books, movies, and music — those times when one thing gives a nod to something that came before it.  I’m not referring to epigraphs or cover songs or novels that retell a story through the eyes of another character, although all of these can be very enjoyable. I’m thinking of instances when, if you know the work to which another work is referring, you experience a little thrill of recognition… and if you don’t know the original, inspirational work but realize that a reference is being made to it, you might be inclined to seek it out.

One fun trail of these “breadcrumbs” occurs in three books by three different authors published over the course of 49 years: A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L’Engle, When You Reach Me by Rebecca Stead, and Breadcrumbs (yes, Breadcrumbs) by Anne Ursu. All three books involve a female protagonist who does not fit in. In all three, the protagonist is being raised by a mother who, if not actually a single parent, is parenting alone at the time of the action. And the first two books were Newbery Award winners.

I’m confident that most of my readers are familiar with A Wrinkle in Time, which was published in 1962. Even if you’ve never read it, you can certainly understand When You Reach Me and Breadcrumbs — both books stand on their own — but you’ll get more out of the books, particularly Stead’s, if you read A Wrinkle in Time first.

Published in 2009, When You Reach Me is set in New York City in the late 1970s. The main character, Miranda, is a sixth grader with one lifelong friend — a boy named Sal, who lives in her apartment building. The book weaves together the story of how Miranda copes when Sal stops talking to her with a mystery involving a series of anonymous notes that have been left for her.  A Wrinkle in Time figures heavily in the story — it is Miranda’s favorite book, and a boy named Marcus uses it to introduce the subject of time travel.

“Some people think it’s possible, you know,” Marcus mumbled.

“What?”

He pointed at my book. “Time travel. Some people think it’s possible. Except those ladies lied, at the beginning of the book.”

“What?”

“Those ladies in the book—Mrs. What, Mrs. Where, and Mrs. Who.”

“Mrs. Whatsit, Mrs. Who, and Mrs. Which,” I corrected him.

He shrugged.

Like When You Reach Me, the 2011 book Breadcrumbs is a tale of a fractured “best and only friends” relationship between the main character, Hazel Anderson, and the boy next door, Jack. Hazel’s name is surely no accident; the book is based somewhat loosely around Hans Christian Andersen’s story, The Snow Queen. Lots of other references show up in the book, including nods to some Andersen’s other fairy tales and to The Hobbit, the Harry Potter series, The Chronicles of Narnia, and, of course, A Wrinkle in Time. Ursu also alludes to When You Reach Me, though only once and not by name.

She opened up the new library book she’d brought for the bus ride and willed her thoughts to disappear in the page. The girl in it was reading A Wrinkle in Time. She was best friends with a boy who lived in the apartment below. And then one day the boy stopped talking to her.

As in Andersen’s fairy tale, Jack is taken by the Snow Queen, and Hazel sets out to save him. But when she enters the woods in pursuit of her friend, things turn dark. This is no delicate fairy tale, where the brave and beautiful heroine seems almost to float through the hardships she encounters, making friends all along the way. In fact, Hazel finds that, once she adventures into the woods, things don’t work at all the way she expected them to. The darkness of the tale reminds me a bit of Neil Gaiman (his Coraline is yet another book that Ursu references in her story), and when one character tells Hazel, “The woods does funny things to people,” I couldn’t help but think of Jennifer Roberson’s Karavans series.

With all of the references in Breadcrumbs, you could set up a year-long book club. But this week I’m going to suggest that you focus on the trail that leads from A Wrinkle in Time to When You Reach Me and, finally, to Breadcrumbs. You won’t regret it.

 

Categories
Make a Difference

Make a Difference: Have Cash Handy… Just in Case

Keep some cash handy

 

“I don’t know if I’m going to eat today.”

I’d never expected someone I knew to utter those words, until a kid at church said that to me a few years ago.

I was taken aback. Fortunately, I knew someone who was close to the kid’s parents, so I mentioned the problem to him. I wanted to help, but at that moment, I only had $5 cash on hand — not enough to buy even one meal for the child’s family (well, maybe some packets of ramen). The man I knew said he’d take care of things, and later he let me know that the family would be okay, but I learned a lesson that day.

Always have cash on hand. Not just for your own sake but for the sake of others.

Since then, I’ve made a point of having $20 cash with me specifically to use on others. I keep it separate from any other money I might happen to have, so I don’t spend it accidentally.

$20 isn’t much, but with it you can:

  • Buy lunch for a family in need.
  • Give a generous tip to a busker or your barista.
  • Help someone on the street who asks you for money, if you feel comfortable giving them cash.
  • Drop money into a collection box for a charity you know.
  • Pay for the person ahead of you in a checkout line if they’re a little short. (Confession: The one time I did this, it was because I was in a hurry and was tired of waiting for the lady in front of me as she searched through her purse for change. Her sincere gratitude made me feel guilty about my motivation.)

Today, consider setting some money aside  — perhaps $20, or perhaps a little more or less than that — to use in those situations when you’d prefer to, or have to, give cash. It feels good when you encounter someone in need and are prepared to help.

Categories
Something Wonderful

Something Wonderful: Rereading Books

I highly recommend re-reading books.

Being a list-maker and someone who prefers not to fly by the seat of her pants, I have a list of topics I might cover on my blog. As far as my “something wonderful” posts go, I want to cover books, music, movies, and other things that most of my readers may not have encountered. That means I plan to skip reviewing the stuff that everyone talks about, like the Netflix series “Stranger Things,” which is, indeed, wonderful… but you’ve already heard that from other sources, haven’t you?

Most of the things on my list are individual items (like Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat) or categories (like slow-burn sci-fi/fantasy romances). So far there has been only one concept on my list: rereading books. I wasn’t really sure, though, if I should bother to post about that. After all, rereading books isn’t that unusual, is it?

And then a friend of mine said to me, “I never reread books.” I decided I would go ahead with the post.

I have a book list that I will never finish. Right now it is more than 23 pages long, and I put books on the list at a faster rate than I remove them. It doesn’t help that I love to reread books, over and over again.

I do read most books only once, but there are many for which once is not enough. After all, if a book counts as “something wonderful,” why on earth wouldn’t I come back to it, particularly since I have a fairly poor memory for things that I don’t need to remember? Give me enough time, and I can safely reread a mystery, because I’ll have forgotten “who dunnit” and why.

Some books I’ve only reread once to date, like Dune, though I keep thinking it might be time to read it again. But many books I’ve read more than that. I’ve read The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings four times each now, and I have no doubt that, given a long enough life, I’m not done rereading them.

Sometimes rereading a book is like visiting an old friend. Give me enough reads through a book like Emma and I will, despite my confessed poor memory for trivial details, remember a fair amount of what the book contains. I remember quite well how fussy Emma’s father is about the health of others and how he urges them to forego rich foods in favor of things like gruel, but I still love to curl up and read those passages again.

Sometimes I develop a new understanding of a character as I reread a book. The first time I read Jane Eyre, I simply saw Edward Rochester as a romantic hero. The second time I read it, I thought he was manipulative and even a little cruel. The third time I read it, I saw him as pitiful, doing the things he did because he was profoundly insecure. Each of these rereadings has given him a complexity of character that I wouldn’t have seen if I had stopped with my first reading.

Sometimes my rereadings deepen my appreciation for a book, particularly for really good children’s literature. I heartily agree with people like C.S. Lewis, who wrote: “A children’s story that can only be enjoyed by children is not a good children’s story in the slightest.” I think that we often rely on the children in our lives (our own children, nieces and nephews, or children we teach) as an excuse to read children’s books. But a really good children’s book needs no excuse and, indeed, if you haven’t reread a book like Winnie-the-Pooh since you were a child (or have never read it at all), you’re missing out.

For instance, when you were four and someone read Winnie-the-Pooh to you, you were probably amused, but some of the humor went right over your head, such as the statement that Piglet’s “grandfather had had two names in case he lost one—Trespassers after an uncle, and William after Trespassers.” I firmly believe that, while Winnie-the-Pooh is a wonderful book to read to little kids, you can’t fully appreciate it until you are an adult.

Likewise, children are entertained by the adventures of Rat, Mole, Mr. Toad, and Badger in The Wind in the Willows, but they tend to miss some of the lyricism in Kenneth Grahame’s writing. The chapter “The Piper at the Gates of Dawn” is so beautiful that musicians like Syd Barrett and Van Morrison have made references to it in album and song titles. Again, it wasn’t until I reached adulthood that I was profoundly moved by the religious awe expressed in that chapter.

Perhaps he would never have dared to raise his eyes, but that, though the piping was now hushed, the call and the summons seemed still dominant and imperious. He might not refuse, were Death himself waiting to strike him instantly, once he had looked with mortal eye on things rightly kept hidden. Trembling he obeyed, and raised his humble head; and then, in that utter clearness of the imminent dawn, while Nature, flushed with fullness of incredible colour, seemed to hold her breath for the event, he looked in the very eyes of the Friend and Helper; saw the backward sweep of the curved horns, gleaming in the growing daylight; saw the stern, hooked nose between the kindly eyes that were looking down on them humorously, while the bearded mouth broke into a half-smile at the corner; saw the rippling muscles on the arm that lay across the broad chest, the long supple hand still holding the pan-pipes only just fallen away from the parted lips; saw the splendid curves of the shaggy limbs disposed in majestic ease on the sward; saw, last of all, nestling between his very hooves, sleeping soundly in entire peace and contentment, the little, round, podgy, childish form of the baby otter. All this he saw, for one moment breathless and intense, vivid on the morning sky; and still, as he looked, he lived; and still, as he lived, he wondered.

“Rat!” he found breath to whisper, shaking. “Are you afraid?”

“Afraid?” murmured the Rat, his eyes shining with unutterable love. “Afraid! Of Him? O, never, never! And yet—and yet—O, Mole, I am afraid!”

When passages like that exist, how can you not reread a book?

This week, think of a book you read once and loved. Pick it up again. Maybe you’ll gain new insights on characters or a new appreciation for the book, or maybe you’ll just re-experience the pleasure that led you to love that book in the first place. Whatever you find between the covers, I hope you will join me in believing that rereading good books is one of life’s great pleasures.

Categories
Make a Difference

Make a Difference: Get Off Your High Horse

Man on a horse
No need to dismount, sir. It’s a figure of speech.
CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=69328

 

I should begin this post by noting that this is not a Christian blog but, if you haven’t figured it out yet, it is a blog written by a Christian. I want my blog to be interesting and useful to anyone of any religious belief, or no belief at all. But, because it is central to my life, my own faith will sometimes come through in my posts. That is certainly the case with this one.

One very important way we can make a difference is by refraining from being judgmental. The problem is, it’s sometimes hard to know when we are being judgmental and when we are distinguishing between right and wrong. I believe there’s a difference.

Refraining from judgmentalism doesn’t mean accepting everything another person does without judgment. The female protagonist in The Bridges of Madison County may have asserted “If you love me, then you must love what I have done,” but that way leads to moral chaos. Love of others does not mean approval of all of their actions. I doubt any of my readers truly believe that, though. If you want to make a difference, you must believe that not all is right with the world. And while events like natural disasters can affect the well-being of others, you probably believe that at least some of the things that trouble you — things like slavery, pollution, poverty, or domestic abuse — are brought about in part or entirely by choices made by people.

As a Christian, I believe the story of the Pharisee and the tax collector in Luke 18 describes judgmentalism well. In a moment of prayer, the Pharisee thanks God that he is “not like other people — robbers, evildoers, adulterers — or even like this tax collector.” He also uses the moment to remind God of all the great things he has done. The tax collector, meanwhile, approaches God humbly, comparing himself to no one and asking God for mercy, because he knows he has done wrong.

A judgmental attitude has everything to do with how you compare yourself to others. While there is still room for distinguishing between right and wrong, people who refrain from being judgmental acknowledge that they are capable of error, that they are not God. Judgmentalism is all about being superior to others.

This can happen not only in areas related to moral issues but even to things like good taste — and perhaps a judgmental attitude is even more damning in this area, if only because the stakes are relatively low, and good taste is hard to define. I do believe that there is such a thing as good and bad art. But if I snigger at someone’s Precious Moments collection, I’m telling myself that I am better than that person, because I have better taste.

The problem is, even if you believe, as I do, that there is good and bad art, taste is subjective. And sometimes, we’re just in the mood for a little junk. Comedian Jim Gaffigan sums it up well in his McDonald’s skit (note: There’s a little swearing in this clip):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YDTfEhChgw

Getting off your high horse doesn’t mean giving up all concepts like right and wrong or artistry. It does mean placing yourself in a position of humility. If you come at a person with an air of superiority, all you’re going to do is alienate them. But if you come to that person as an equal who disagrees with them on a certain point, you can actually engage in a dialogue.

And if your point of disagreement is how your neighbors decorate their lawn for Christmas, just let it go. After all, you secretly read trashy fanfiction. As Jim Gaffigan says, “It’s all McDonald’s.”

Categories
Something Wonderful

Something Wonderful: An Early Version of Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat

album art from Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat
This groovy album art gives you a good idea about what to expect from the cantata.

You may be familiar with the musical Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat by Tim Rice and Andrew Lloyd Webber. But did you know that this musical was originally a cantata written for an English boys’ school? I was fortunate enough to grow up on the 1971 Scepter Records release, and I listened to it so much that at one point I could practically sing the whole thing through from beginning to end without referring to the lyrics. Of course, the cantata is much shorter than the musical. The version I first knew did not yet include “One More Angel in Heaven,” “Grovel, Grovel,” or “Benjamin Calypso,” and many songs were shorter than their counterparts in the musical. (Note: The original 1971 recording does not have a track listing, but that was added when the album was converted to MP3. According to the MP3 version’s track listing, “One More Angel in Heaven” and “Benjamin Calypso” are on the album, but I assure you that they aren’t.)

The differences between the early recording and the musical go far beyond length. In the older version, the accents are British, a boys’ choir plays a major role, and many of the songs have a distinctly ’60s feel that isn’t present in the modern musical. Compare the “Go, Go, Go Joseph” sample from the 1971 recording, complete with electric guitar and Hammond organ, to the version from the 1999 movie. While the musical tries to evoke the ’60s in the setting and costumes, the original version feels far more authentic… because it is.

The cantata is raw and, if you buy the MP3 album, you get treated to breaks between tracks that remind you that this originally came from an LP. But I far prefer the freshness of this early version to the slick Broadway production. After all, if you’re going to listen to something with the word “technicolor” in it, it might as well have the groovy vibe that word brings to mind.

This week, return to the early days of Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat. Take some time to at least sample the Scepter album, and consider buying a track or even the whole album.

Categories
Make a Difference

Make a Difference: Put Your Name on an Email List… or Two

Put your name on some email lists

Adding your name to an email list is a great way to get regular suggestions on how you can make a difference. Here are some of my favorites:

New Dream enewsletter

I almost didn’t recommend the first newsletter on my list, because the organization that publishes it, the Center for a New American Dream, is in transition. The center will be renamed New Dream and will streamline its mission to focus on the issues of kids and commercialism and simplifying the holidays, as well as directing more resources to promoting its alternative gift registry, SoKind. In the end, I decided to mention the “In Balance” newsletter anyway. It’s a valuable resource and will hopefully continue to be one under New Dream’s evolving structure. The newsletter comes out on an irregular basis, generally no more than once a month. You can read past issues through December 2015 on the organization’s website; note that they have not posted issues since then. To add your name to the email list, submit your information through the “Stay Informed” box at the top of any page on their site.

Climate Caretakers enewsletter

Climate Caretakers is a Christian organization committed to prayer and action on climate change. They send out two monthly newsletters: one focused on action steps and a second, prayer-focused newsletter. The screen shot I’ve included is of the November action letter. This is the first time I remember them using the newsletter to solicit donations, so it isn’t the best example of the usual action steps. There are always three levels of action presented, so that you can take a baby step or dive in, depending on your comfort level. You can see more action newsletters or sign up for both the action and prayer letters (I cannot find an option to sign up for just one) on their Act Now page. Like New Dream, Climate Caretakers has not posted their most recent newsletters.

End Slavery Now enewsletter

End Slavery Now sends out weekly newsletters that include ways you can act against slavery. Tips include changing your buying habits, signing petitions, and printing out hotline numbers to make available to others. They used to include three action items every week, but more recent newsletters have contained fewer items. You can find past action items in their action library, and you can sign up for the newsletter on their “act” page.

Life Vest Inside enewsletter

Life Vest Inside is the organization behind the “Kindness Boomerang” video; its mission is to promote acts of kindness. The organization sends out daily emails. Each includes a quotation about kindness, an action step, a positive affirmation, and a short video about an act of kindness. You can sign up on their “Get Involved” page. You can also sign up to be a Kindness Ambassador; you’ll get an additional weekly email if you do that.

Simpler Living Nudge enewsletter

Simple Living Works! is a Christian organization that originated in 2012 after its predecessor, Alternatives for Simple Living, closed up shop. The organization offers online resources, a biweekly podcast, a monthly email newsletter (not featured in the screenshot above), and a daily “nudge” email (pictured above). To subscribe to the nudge, send an email with the subject line “NUDGE” to SimpleLivingWorks AT yahoo DOT com. You can subscribe to the monthly newsletter by sending an email to the same address, using the subject line “SUBSCRIBE.”

The email newsletter is full of links to different resources on simple living; the nudge is very short. I wish the newsletter and website were streamlined, making these resources as simple as the organization’s name. There’s also a distinctly old-fashioned feel to many of the resources. You may think of them as “retro cool,” but I find myself wishing for a more modern feel. I don’t think “simple” means “stuck in the ’70s.” My complaints aside, I wouldn’t recommend this resource if I didn’t think the newsletters provided useful tips related to simplicity.

Sometime over the weekend, sign up for an email newsletter or two. Just remember: You can only eat an elephant one bite at a time, so if you sign up for all of the emails (as I have done), don’t expect that you’ll be able to follow all of their tips for making a difference… or even that you’ll have time to carefully read each email as it comes in!

Categories
Something Wonderful

Something Wonderful: “Haven’t You Heard? I’m Sakamoto” (“Sakamoto desu ga?”)

I think it’s safe to say that most American adults don’t watch anime — with the exception, perhaps, of Hayao Miyazaki’s films. I don’t plan to try to convert my readers into dedicated viewers, but there are some gems out there. One of them is a short series called “Haven’t You Heard? I’m Sakamoto” (“Sakamoto desu ga?” in Japanese).

What makes this series worth your while is the completely over-the-top title character. Sakamoto is the coolest, most stylish kid in high school, worshiped by females and males of all ages. He regularly wins over his most jealous foes with his unflappable ability to handle any situation that is thrown his way. He is a fantastic student, but he is never awkwardly nerdy. He is aloof but usually kind (there are a couple of weird exceptions, like when he refers to a fellow student’s “zit face”). He is good without being a goody-goody. He is, in a word, Sakamoto.

My daughter pulled me into this one. After the first episode, I said, “They can’t possibly keep this up.” The situations Sakamoto faced and the ways he handled them were so outrageous that it would be easy for the creators to push the concept too hard and end up falling flat. But they kept it up for 13 episodes and then gracefully brought the show to a close before it got old.

I’ve shared the show with a couple of people who don’t watch anime, and they found it entertaining enough that I feel confident that it has broad appeal outside of anime nerds. That said, your appreciation of it will only deepen if you’re an anime watcher. Sakamoto’s “secret techniques” are funny, whether or not you are familiar with anime; however, if you’ve watched certain shows like “Hunter x Hunter,” you’ll recognize the techniques as a trope.

My daughter, who has taken two years of Japanese, has an even deeper appreciation of “Sakamoto” than I do. In providing the subtitles, the translators try to let English-speakers know that certain characters are “bad boys” who swear a lot, but my child says that these kids are speaking a sort of “bad boy” slang.

Episodes are approximately 24 minutes long. The show falls into the PG/PG-13 range, so parents will want to review it before sharing it with young kids. This week, when you need a laugh, take in an episode. Like everyone around him, you’ll fall in love with Sakamoto. You can find the show on Crunchyroll.

Categories
Make a Difference

Make a Difference: Approach Christmas Shopping Thoughtfully

Do your Christmas shopping thoughtfully.

With Thanksgiving a week away, it seems appropriate to post about Christmas shopping. For those of us who exchange Christmas gifts, this time of year can be filled with purchasing decisions. One way we can make a difference in the world is to approach these decisions thoughtfully.

Think About Who You Are Buying For

We’ve probably all received an “obligation” gift – a present that a person bought for you because they felt that they had to give you a gift, but they clearly didn’t put any thought into it. The shirt that isn’t your style. The scented candle you’ll never use. These are the gifts that say, “I don’t know what you like, and I can’t be bothered to find out.”

Don’t be that giver.

If you’re going to buy someone a gift, try to get something you think the recipient will love. There’s no point in giving something just to check an item off your list. A real gift is given out of consideration for the other person. What are their interests? What are their needs? What do they love? What should you avoid buying, because the receiver will absolutely hate it?  Sometimes, despite your best efforts, you get it wrong. But most people can tell when you bought a gift to please them instead of buying a gift because you felt you had to. They’ll appreciate the effort.

Think About What You’ll Spend

In a previous post, I mentioned the concept of “margin” – leaving room in your life, including in your finances, from which to make your contributions to the world. Many people have chosen to spend less at Christmas in order to have more for the things that really matter to them.

Some of my most treasured gifts were inexpensive but very thoughtful. One anniversary my husband located a copy of Space Battleship Yamato, a Japanese cartoon we had both treasured as children. He made breakfast, and we watched the cartoon together. It’s one of the best gifts I’ve ever been given.

I won’t pretend there aren’t people who care how much you spend, but gift-giving is your choice. Decide ahead of time where you values lie and how much you can afford to give, and spend accordingly.

Think About When to Shop

Many stores have decided not to open on Thanksgiving this year. Frankly, I’m glad. I believe it’s good to have a few days a year when employees whose jobs are not critical to public safety can have time off to spend with their loved ones. Some stores offer time and a half for employees who work on holidays (though this is not legally required), and some employees would rather get the extra cash for working on Thanksgiving. But as I recall from my days in retail, most of us were happy to have a holiday off, and things don’t appear to have changed much since then. As you decide whether or not to patronize the stores that open on Thanksgiving (or just after midnight on Friday – an hour which requires many retail employees to decide between family time and sleep), take the people who will be there to serve you into consideration. Make your decision on whether or not to shop based on how you feel your choice will impact their lives.

If you want to be really radical and protest a culture that seems to value consumption and profit over health and happiness, consider celebrating “Buy Nothing Day” on Black Friday, too. REI is encouraging people to spend the day outside instead of shopping.

Think About Where You’ll Shop

Shopping at big box stores isn’t evil; you are helping to pay the wages of retail workers, many of whom badly need the money. But there are advantages to buying from small businesses in your community: more of the money you spend stays local, strengthening the economy in your area; small businesses add a character to your community that you don’t get from cookie-cutter national chains; and small businesses are actually a major source of employment opportunities. When you choose to forego doorbuster sales for personalized shopping at small businesses, your support makes a very real difference.

Categories
Something Wonderful

Something Wonderful: Tea Duelling

Biscuits for tea duelling
If you’re an American, use these biscuits.

 

I first heard about tea duelling in 2012 at Teslacon, a steampunk convention in Wisconsin. [Note: I use the British spelling for “tea duelling.”] Major Tinker (John Naylor’s steampunk persona) is one of two men who created tea duelling. He was present at the con that year, eager to share the relatively new sport with others. I was nervous about signing up for something that I knew nothing about, so I sat in the audience, learning the rules and watching people duel. When I left the room, I vowed never to turn down the opportunity to duel again. Aside from the duels over which I have presided, I’ve kept  that promise. I also became a bit of a tea duelling evangelist, teaching it to my daughter, my friends, and, most recently, the kids in my church’s middle school youth group.

As I recall it, Major Tinker said that he and a friend were at a traveling tea museum in England and noticed a sign that read “Tea Duelling is strictly forbidden.” Of course, this raised the question: “What is tea duelling?” The two men decided the intriguing sign needed to have a real sport behind it. They came up with this:

If you are going to duel properly, you should acquaint yourself with the rules of the sport. When I give a short explanation of duelling to others, I say that the opponents dunk their biscuits in the tea to the count of five, and then each tries to be the last person to achieve a “clean nom.” A clean nom involves getting all of the biscuit into your mouth in one bite without it crumbling and landing in your tea, on the table (or floor), or on your person. Note that there is an important bit of information missing from the official rules: how much of the biscuit should be submersed in the tea. I’ve heard anything from one half of the biscuit to three-quarters of it. When I serve as Pot Mistress, I ask duellists to dunk at least three-quarters of their biscuit in their tea.

The founders came up with a selection of approved biscuits for duellists in the U.K.; in the United States, we have one official choice: Pepperidge Farm Chessmen. The cookies should be displayed face down, so that the duellists don’t pick a biscuit based on the image on it. Although I do not know of any testing that proves this, some images might “work” better than others. If neither duellist can see the images, they have equal chances of picking a “good” or “bad” biscuit.

Someone with gluten intolerance once asked me about gluten-free biscuits, and I ran the question by the founder of the American Tea Dueling Society. She suggested that gluten-free biscuits could be provided, but the duellists must always have the same kind of biscuit so that neither has an advantage over the other.

While a proper duel consists of, at a minimum, the duellists and Pot Master or Mistress, you can always informally duel with a friend. It’s also perfectly acceptable to practice alone for future duels. Rumor has it that the cookie calories don’t count when consumed during a practice session.

This week, challenge a friend to a duel over a couple of cups of tea and some biscuits!