Categories
Something Wonderful

Something Wonderful: Children’s Books About Strong Princesses

Books about strong princesses, including Cinder Edna

 

A couple of years ago, I participated on the “Do we really need princesses anymore?” panel at CONvergence. I came in pro-princess (in fact, I don’t remember a lot of “anti-princess” sentiment), arguing that there are strong princess role models for children in many books. The fact is, for some reason, lots of girls are going to gravitate toward princesses. I’m not going to try to guess at all of the reasons this is so, though I think it is fair to argue that our culture encourages it. I simply believe that it’s okay to let our children dream of princesses. Let’s just make them heroic characters in their own right.

I brought a list of children’s books that feature strong princesses, and I received the thrill of my life when (1) I realized I was sitting next to an author I admired, and (2) she told people to come up and take my list, because it was a good one.

A few of my readers may have seen my list, but because I believe that many have not, I am sharing it here. All of these books are worth reading, and I’ve indicated my particular favorites. The list is slightly updated from the original list I shared at CONvergence.

Strong Princesses in Literature for the Young, the Young-at-Heart, and Their Families

Picture books

The Very Fairy Princess by Julie Andrews and Emma Walton Hamliton – Although in many ways very pink, sparkly, and girly, this fairy-princess obsessed girl also contradicts others’ views of fairy princesses.

The Princess and the Pig by Jonathan Emmett – An infant princess and piglet are accidentally swapped, and the princess is raised in poverty by loving parents.

The Princess Knight by Cornelia Funke – A princess learns to be a knight and wins her own hand in marriage in a tournament.

Princess Pigsty by Cornelia Funke – Bored of being a princess, Isabella rebels. She is eventually banished to the pigsty, where she is very happy.

Princess Grace by Mary Hoffman – A princess-obsessed girl redefines princesses – for herself and her community.

Cinder Edna by Ellen Jackson – Contrasts Cinderella, pitiful, helpless, and shallow, with Cinder Edna, practical, fun, and capable. Their princes are very different, too! (One of my favorites)

Princesses Are Not Quitters! By Kate Lum – Three princesses decide to be servants for a day. After their hard day, they make life easier on their servants… and they continue to do many of the chores.

The Paper Bag Princess by Robert Munsch – A dragon burns down Elizabeth’s castle (also destroying her clothes) and carries off her betrothed, Prince Ronald. Wearing a paper bag, she rescues Ronald, only to discover he’s not worth the trouble. (Another favorite)

Sleeping Bobby by Mary Pope Osborne and Will Osborne – A gender-neutral, otherwise very faithful retelling of Sleeping Beauty. Prince Bob is Sleeping Beauty, gifted with kindness, courage and modesty, “qualities that anyone might wish for and admire.” He is rescued by an unnamed princess who shares his virtues. (Also one of my favorites)

Part-time Princess by Deborah Underwood – An ordinary girl turns into a princess at night. In frilly dresses, she regularly saves her kingdom from disaster. (Yet another favorite)

Easy readers

The Princess in Black by Shannon Hale and Dean Hale – A perfect princess and her supposed unicorn are secretly a monster-fighting duo. Since I first put it on this list, Hale and Hale have added more books to the series: The Princess in Black and the Perfect Princess Party and The Princess in Black and the Hungry Bunny Horde.

Comic Books and Graphic Novels

Princeless by Jeremy Whitley – This series has a diverse cast of characters and some very funny moments (my favorite bit occurs early in the series, when a female is trying to choose armor). It now includes a spin-off series, Raven: The Pirate Princess. I have one caveat: Someone once said to me, “I wish all of the men [in the series] weren’t evil.” At the time, I didn’t agree that the books were anti-male, but having read a couple of Raven volumes, I understand what that person meant. Some people reject feminism because they think that feminists believe all men are awful. I strongly disagree with that view of feminism, but Whitley manages to reinforce the stereotype in a scene in which Raven selects her crew.

Rapunzel’s Revenge by Shannon Hale and Dean Hale – Rapunzel in a Weird West universe

Wonder Woman – Need I say more? I especially enjoy the first six volumes of the New 52 Wonder Woman series (Blood, Guts, Iron, War, Flesh, and Bones).

Books for Older Children and Teens

The Girl of Fire and Thorns by Rae Carson – The princess is strong, but the author’s attempt to write a body-positive story hasn’t gone over well with some people. There are more books in the series, but I haven’t read them.

The Goose Girl and The Princess Academy series by Shannon Hale – All of these books feature strong female characters, including princesses. There is a heavy emphasis on romance.

Dealing With Dragons by Patricia Wrede – Funny book featuring a princess who is definitely a role model. There are more books in the series, but I haven’t read them all. (A favorite)

Categories
Something Wonderful

Something Wonderful: Sample Days at TeaSource

TeaSource sample tray
TeaSource sample tray

I promised to limit the number of location-specific posts I write, and I plan to keep that promise. But occasionally I have to recommend something tied to a place, and this is one of those cases. If you drink tea and find yourself in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area, you must take advantage of sample days at TeaSource on Tuesdays and Thursdays.

Even without its sample days, TeaSource is a wonderful store for serious tea lovers. They sell well over 200 teas of all sorts, ranging from popular types of teas, such as black and green teas, to more unusual puer and dark teas. They offer classes covering everything from the history of tea to pairing tea with food. At the 2015 World Tea Expo they were named Best Tea Business. I’ve purchased some of my favorite teas from TeaSource.

The best days to visit the store are its sample days. For $5, you get a tray of five different teas. Every sample day has a theme. Sometimes the theme focuses on a variety of tea or a geographical area. Other times the theme might be “staff favorites” or “Halloween treats.” The samples are generous, so if you are caffeine-sensitive, you should try to go early in the day rather than a couple of hours before bed. Each tray includes a card that identifies the teas, and you can use the card to get a discount on any of the featured teas on the day they are offered as samples.

When I first decided to write this post, I tried to find similar sample trays at other tea shops for readers who live elsewhere. I’m sure they must exist somewhere, but I couldn’t find any. It’s too bad. If you have the chance to enjoy a sample tray at TeaSource or somewhere else, take advantage of it. A cup of tea is always a treat, but the chance to savor five different teas, comparing them and finding new favorites, is absolutely wonderful.

October 2018: TeaSource has replaced their sample trays with tea flights. Like the sample trays, the flights are based around a theme. Each flight is available for one week, Monday through Friday. Flights are $7 for three different teas. While I am sorry to see the sample trays go, I understand that businesses must raise their prices, and I definitely will try the new tea flights.

Categories
Something Wonderful

Something Wonderful: Slate’s Wonder Week

Stevie Wonder is the focus of Slate's Wonder Week
Photo by Alan Light

As I wrote in a previous post, I want to use the “something wonderful” series to introduce readers to things they may not know about. That means that, despite the fact that I think Stevie Wonder is a musical genius, I didn’t feel I could add him to my list of possible topics. But last week Slate gave the world a gift in the form of Wonder Week, which gives me an excuse to write about Wonder anyway.

Wonder Week was conceived after Prince’s death, when Slate staff members decided it would be good to pay tribute to a musical genius while he or she was still alive. Their pick was none other than Wonder, and I couldn’t be happier about their choice.

My own appreciation for Wonder blossomed only recently. I don’t remember a time when I didn’t know or enjoy his music. I even bought one of his albums when I was a teen. (I’d love to claim it was one of the ones from his classic period, but I’m afraid it was In Square Circle, which I bought because I was very into the schmaltzy song “Overjoyed.”) But I sort of took him for granted.

Then I experienced something akin to the rom-com trope where the protagonist realizes that they’ve been in love with their best friend all along. You know: All this time I’ve been chasing after X, and I’ve been taking you for granted! But you… you’ve always been there for me. How could I have been so blind? 

In Wonder’s case, I read an interview with someone — I can no longer remember who — in which that person proclaimed Wonder a musical genius, and I found myself thinking, “Of course.” I started checking his music out from the library and once again buying it for myself, this time paying more attention to his peak years than I had when I was a teen. I noticed things about his music and the way others responded to it. I was in a consignment shop when “My Cherie Amour” came on. Not one of us in the store remained unaffected. We sang or hummed along; we danced a little (even though it is not a particularly “dance-y” song). Another time Sting’s “Brand New Day” came on the radio, and I found myself thinking, “The harmonica player has to be Stevie Wonder,” because his playing was so distinctive. Wonder’s music had always been very present in my life, but suddenly I’d gone from just enjoying the music to being a fan.

So of course I was very excited when Slate unveiled their week-long tribute to Wonder. I learned that he is a great drummer, and I was introduced to the Black “Happy Birthday” Song and the story behind it. I reveled in an essay written in appreciation of Wonder’s “Fozzie Bear voice,” and I discovered that the type of harmonica he uses is one reason his playing is so distinctive. I came away with an even deeper appreciation for a musician I already greatly admire.

So, yes, I’m endorsing a man who doesn’t need my endorsement: Stevie Wonder. But whether you are one of his fans or just find yourself tapping your foot to his music without stopping to think about what an amazing musician he is, you’ll find Slate’s Wonder Week worth your while. You’ll come away with new insights, and if you aren’t already in love with him, this just might be the push you need.

Categories
Something Wonderful

Something Wonderful: Never Cry Wolf

Never Cry Wolf

While I’ve never done movie marketing, I feel strongly that this Disney trailer for Never Cry Wolf doesn’t sell the movie well.

So I guess it’s up to me to convince you that it’s worth your while to watch it.

I’ve considered this to be among my favorite films since I first saw it in the 1980s. Part of the attraction is the main character, Tyler, who reminds me a little of a favorite uncle… and a little of myself. There are those of us who will resonate with Tyler’s introverted thoughtfulness. He’s one of those people who quietly observes the world, “a watcher of things” as he calls himself. Anyone who has felt as if they were “always watching others do and feel things I wouldn’t or couldn’t do myself” will identify with Tyler.

But my love for the movie goes far beyond the main character. Never Cry Wolf is every bit as visually stunning as director Carroll Ballard’s first feature film, The Black Stallion. Viewers are treated to sweeping shots of the arctic wilderness and, of course, lots of footage of wolves. Mark Isham’s score is a perfect match for the cinematography; it’s a shame that there isn’t even a snippet of his music in the trailer. Fortunately, the composer has shared his score on SoundCloud. Listen to the second track to hear how he managed to musically capture the essence of wolves’ howls.

The trailer does capture a little of the humor in the movie, although there are far better scenes than Tyler throwing crates of toilet paper out of a plane in an attempt to lighten the load. The movie isn’t a comedy, but like the book on which it’s based, it contains several comic moments. Perhaps it’s best that Disney didn’t share some of the funnier scenes; it means they’ll surprise you.

According to IMDB, one of the movie’s taglines is “A true story.” The quibble I hear most often about both the movie and Farley Mowat’s book by the same name is that the story isn’t particularly true. In 1973, a decade after the book’s publication, Mowat wrote that “it is my practice never to allow facts to interfere with truth.” I understand what he means. Stories that are not factually accurate can convey the truth. Mowat also said that Never Cry Wolf had started as a satire about bureaucracy, but “the wolf took the book right out of my hands.” Still, because there are people who feel misled, I wish the book had been published as fiction.

Continuing scientific research has revealed that some of the things Mowat thought were true about wolves aren’t so. None of this changes the value of Never Cry Wolf in fostering a love of and appreciation for nature, including wolves. For this alone, the movie is worth watching.

Never Cry Wolf is easy to find. Disney offers it on demand, and you can also purchase the DVD, get it through Netflix or, perhaps, borrow it through your local library. Hunt it down and take the time to enjoy it. Like me, you may decide that it’s among your favorite movies.

Categories
Something Wonderful

Something Wonderful: A Wrinkle in Time – When You Reach Me – Breadcrumbs

Picture of books

I love cultural “breadcrumbs” in books, movies, and music — those times when one thing gives a nod to something that came before it.  I’m not referring to epigraphs or cover songs or novels that retell a story through the eyes of another character, although all of these can be very enjoyable. I’m thinking of instances when, if you know the work to which another work is referring, you experience a little thrill of recognition… and if you don’t know the original, inspirational work but realize that a reference is being made to it, you might be inclined to seek it out.

One fun trail of these “breadcrumbs” occurs in three books by three different authors published over the course of 49 years: A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L’Engle, When You Reach Me by Rebecca Stead, and Breadcrumbs (yes, Breadcrumbs) by Anne Ursu. All three books involve a female protagonist who does not fit in. In all three, the protagonist is being raised by a mother who, if not actually a single parent, is parenting alone at the time of the action. And the first two books were Newbery Award winners.

I’m confident that most of my readers are familiar with A Wrinkle in Time, which was published in 1962. Even if you’ve never read it, you can certainly understand When You Reach Me and Breadcrumbs — both books stand on their own — but you’ll get more out of the books, particularly Stead’s, if you read A Wrinkle in Time first.

Published in 2009, When You Reach Me is set in New York City in the late 1970s. The main character, Miranda, is a sixth grader with one lifelong friend — a boy named Sal, who lives in her apartment building. The book weaves together the story of how Miranda copes when Sal stops talking to her with a mystery involving a series of anonymous notes that have been left for her.  A Wrinkle in Time figures heavily in the story — it is Miranda’s favorite book, and a boy named Marcus uses it to introduce the subject of time travel.

“Some people think it’s possible, you know,” Marcus mumbled.

“What?”

He pointed at my book. “Time travel. Some people think it’s possible. Except those ladies lied, at the beginning of the book.”

“What?”

“Those ladies in the book—Mrs. What, Mrs. Where, and Mrs. Who.”

“Mrs. Whatsit, Mrs. Who, and Mrs. Which,” I corrected him.

He shrugged.

Like When You Reach Me, the 2011 book Breadcrumbs is a tale of a fractured “best and only friends” relationship between the main character, Hazel Anderson, and the boy next door, Jack. Hazel’s name is surely no accident; the book is based somewhat loosely around Hans Christian Andersen’s story, The Snow Queen. Lots of other references show up in the book, including nods to some Andersen’s other fairy tales and to The Hobbit, the Harry Potter series, The Chronicles of Narnia, and, of course, A Wrinkle in Time. Ursu also alludes to When You Reach Me, though only once and not by name.

She opened up the new library book she’d brought for the bus ride and willed her thoughts to disappear in the page. The girl in it was reading A Wrinkle in Time. She was best friends with a boy who lived in the apartment below. And then one day the boy stopped talking to her.

As in Andersen’s fairy tale, Jack is taken by the Snow Queen, and Hazel sets out to save him. But when she enters the woods in pursuit of her friend, things turn dark. This is no delicate fairy tale, where the brave and beautiful heroine seems almost to float through the hardships she encounters, making friends all along the way. In fact, Hazel finds that, once she adventures into the woods, things don’t work at all the way she expected them to. The darkness of the tale reminds me a bit of Neil Gaiman (his Coraline is yet another book that Ursu references in her story), and when one character tells Hazel, “The woods does funny things to people,” I couldn’t help but think of Jennifer Roberson’s Karavans series.

With all of the references in Breadcrumbs, you could set up a year-long book club. But this week I’m going to suggest that you focus on the trail that leads from A Wrinkle in Time to When You Reach Me and, finally, to Breadcrumbs. You won’t regret it.

 

Categories
Something Wonderful

Something Wonderful: Rereading Books

I highly recommend re-reading books.

Being a list-maker and someone who prefers not to fly by the seat of her pants, I have a list of topics I might cover on my blog. As far as my “something wonderful” posts go, I want to cover books, music, movies, and other things that most of my readers may not have encountered. That means I plan to skip reviewing the stuff that everyone talks about, like the Netflix series “Stranger Things,” which is, indeed, wonderful… but you’ve already heard that from other sources, haven’t you?

Most of the things on my list are individual items (like Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat) or categories (like slow-burn sci-fi/fantasy romances). So far there has been only one concept on my list: rereading books. I wasn’t really sure, though, if I should bother to post about that. After all, rereading books isn’t that unusual, is it?

And then a friend of mine said to me, “I never reread books.” I decided I would go ahead with the post.

I have a book list that I will never finish. Right now it is more than 23 pages long, and I put books on the list at a faster rate than I remove them. It doesn’t help that I love to reread books, over and over again.

I do read most books only once, but there are many for which once is not enough. After all, if a book counts as “something wonderful,” why on earth wouldn’t I come back to it, particularly since I have a fairly poor memory for things that I don’t need to remember? Give me enough time, and I can safely reread a mystery, because I’ll have forgotten “who dunnit” and why.

Some books I’ve only reread once to date, like Dune, though I keep thinking it might be time to read it again. But many books I’ve read more than that. I’ve read The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings four times each now, and I have no doubt that, given a long enough life, I’m not done rereading them.

Sometimes rereading a book is like visiting an old friend. Give me enough reads through a book like Emma and I will, despite my confessed poor memory for trivial details, remember a fair amount of what the book contains. I remember quite well how fussy Emma’s father is about the health of others and how he urges them to forego rich foods in favor of things like gruel, but I still love to curl up and read those passages again.

Sometimes I develop a new understanding of a character as I reread a book. The first time I read Jane Eyre, I simply saw Edward Rochester as a romantic hero. The second time I read it, I thought he was manipulative and even a little cruel. The third time I read it, I saw him as pitiful, doing the things he did because he was profoundly insecure. Each of these rereadings has given him a complexity of character that I wouldn’t have seen if I had stopped with my first reading.

Sometimes my rereadings deepen my appreciation for a book, particularly for really good children’s literature. I heartily agree with people like C.S. Lewis, who wrote: “A children’s story that can only be enjoyed by children is not a good children’s story in the slightest.” I think that we often rely on the children in our lives (our own children, nieces and nephews, or children we teach) as an excuse to read children’s books. But a really good children’s book needs no excuse and, indeed, if you haven’t reread a book like Winnie-the-Pooh since you were a child (or have never read it at all), you’re missing out.

For instance, when you were four and someone read Winnie-the-Pooh to you, you were probably amused, but some of the humor went right over your head, such as the statement that Piglet’s “grandfather had had two names in case he lost one—Trespassers after an uncle, and William after Trespassers.” I firmly believe that, while Winnie-the-Pooh is a wonderful book to read to little kids, you can’t fully appreciate it until you are an adult.

Likewise, children are entertained by the adventures of Rat, Mole, Mr. Toad, and Badger in The Wind in the Willows, but they tend to miss some of the lyricism in Kenneth Grahame’s writing. The chapter “The Piper at the Gates of Dawn” is so beautiful that musicians like Syd Barrett and Van Morrison have made references to it in album and song titles. Again, it wasn’t until I reached adulthood that I was profoundly moved by the religious awe expressed in that chapter.

Perhaps he would never have dared to raise his eyes, but that, though the piping was now hushed, the call and the summons seemed still dominant and imperious. He might not refuse, were Death himself waiting to strike him instantly, once he had looked with mortal eye on things rightly kept hidden. Trembling he obeyed, and raised his humble head; and then, in that utter clearness of the imminent dawn, while Nature, flushed with fullness of incredible colour, seemed to hold her breath for the event, he looked in the very eyes of the Friend and Helper; saw the backward sweep of the curved horns, gleaming in the growing daylight; saw the stern, hooked nose between the kindly eyes that were looking down on them humorously, while the bearded mouth broke into a half-smile at the corner; saw the rippling muscles on the arm that lay across the broad chest, the long supple hand still holding the pan-pipes only just fallen away from the parted lips; saw the splendid curves of the shaggy limbs disposed in majestic ease on the sward; saw, last of all, nestling between his very hooves, sleeping soundly in entire peace and contentment, the little, round, podgy, childish form of the baby otter. All this he saw, for one moment breathless and intense, vivid on the morning sky; and still, as he looked, he lived; and still, as he lived, he wondered.

“Rat!” he found breath to whisper, shaking. “Are you afraid?”

“Afraid?” murmured the Rat, his eyes shining with unutterable love. “Afraid! Of Him? O, never, never! And yet—and yet—O, Mole, I am afraid!”

When passages like that exist, how can you not reread a book?

This week, think of a book you read once and loved. Pick it up again. Maybe you’ll gain new insights on characters or a new appreciation for the book, or maybe you’ll just re-experience the pleasure that led you to love that book in the first place. Whatever you find between the covers, I hope you will join me in believing that rereading good books is one of life’s great pleasures.

Categories
Something Wonderful

Something Wonderful: An Early Version of Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat

album art from Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat
This groovy album art gives you a good idea about what to expect from the cantata.

You may be familiar with the musical Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat by Tim Rice and Andrew Lloyd Webber. But did you know that this musical was originally a cantata written for an English boys’ school? I was fortunate enough to grow up on the 1971 Scepter Records release, and I listened to it so much that at one point I could practically sing the whole thing through from beginning to end without referring to the lyrics. Of course, the cantata is much shorter than the musical. The version I first knew did not yet include “One More Angel in Heaven,” “Grovel, Grovel,” or “Benjamin Calypso,” and many songs were shorter than their counterparts in the musical. (Note: The original 1971 recording does not have a track listing, but that was added when the album was converted to MP3. According to the MP3 version’s track listing, “One More Angel in Heaven” and “Benjamin Calypso” are on the album, but I assure you that they aren’t.)

The differences between the early recording and the musical go far beyond length. In the older version, the accents are British, a boys’ choir plays a major role, and many of the songs have a distinctly ’60s feel that isn’t present in the modern musical. Compare the “Go, Go, Go Joseph” sample from the 1971 recording, complete with electric guitar and Hammond organ, to the version from the 1999 movie. While the musical tries to evoke the ’60s in the setting and costumes, the original version feels far more authentic… because it is.

The cantata is raw and, if you buy the MP3 album, you get treated to breaks between tracks that remind you that this originally came from an LP. But I far prefer the freshness of this early version to the slick Broadway production. After all, if you’re going to listen to something with the word “technicolor” in it, it might as well have the groovy vibe that word brings to mind.

This week, return to the early days of Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat. Take some time to at least sample the Scepter album, and consider buying a track or even the whole album.

Categories
Something Wonderful

Something Wonderful: “Haven’t You Heard? I’m Sakamoto” (“Sakamoto desu ga?”)

I think it’s safe to say that most American adults don’t watch anime — with the exception, perhaps, of Hayao Miyazaki’s films. I don’t plan to try to convert my readers into dedicated viewers, but there are some gems out there. One of them is a short series called “Haven’t You Heard? I’m Sakamoto” (“Sakamoto desu ga?” in Japanese).

What makes this series worth your while is the completely over-the-top title character. Sakamoto is the coolest, most stylish kid in high school, worshiped by females and males of all ages. He regularly wins over his most jealous foes with his unflappable ability to handle any situation that is thrown his way. He is a fantastic student, but he is never awkwardly nerdy. He is aloof but usually kind (there are a couple of weird exceptions, like when he refers to a fellow student’s “zit face”). He is good without being a goody-goody. He is, in a word, Sakamoto.

My daughter pulled me into this one. After the first episode, I said, “They can’t possibly keep this up.” The situations Sakamoto faced and the ways he handled them were so outrageous that it would be easy for the creators to push the concept too hard and end up falling flat. But they kept it up for 13 episodes and then gracefully brought the show to a close before it got old.

I’ve shared the show with a couple of people who don’t watch anime, and they found it entertaining enough that I feel confident that it has broad appeal outside of anime nerds. That said, your appreciation of it will only deepen if you’re an anime watcher. Sakamoto’s “secret techniques” are funny, whether or not you are familiar with anime; however, if you’ve watched certain shows like “Hunter x Hunter,” you’ll recognize the techniques as a trope.

My daughter, who has taken two years of Japanese, has an even deeper appreciation of “Sakamoto” than I do. In providing the subtitles, the translators try to let English-speakers know that certain characters are “bad boys” who swear a lot, but my child says that these kids are speaking a sort of “bad boy” slang.

Episodes are approximately 24 minutes long. The show falls into the PG/PG-13 range, so parents will want to review it before sharing it with young kids. This week, when you need a laugh, take in an episode. Like everyone around him, you’ll fall in love with Sakamoto. You can find the show on Crunchyroll.

Categories
Something Wonderful

Something Wonderful: Tea Duelling

Biscuits for tea duelling
If you’re an American, use these biscuits.

 

I first heard about tea duelling in 2012 at Teslacon, a steampunk convention in Wisconsin. [Note: I use the British spelling for “tea duelling.”] Major Tinker (John Naylor’s steampunk persona) is one of two men who created tea duelling. He was present at the con that year, eager to share the relatively new sport with others. I was nervous about signing up for something that I knew nothing about, so I sat in the audience, learning the rules and watching people duel. When I left the room, I vowed never to turn down the opportunity to duel again. Aside from the duels over which I have presided, I’ve kept  that promise. I also became a bit of a tea duelling evangelist, teaching it to my daughter, my friends, and, most recently, the kids in my church’s middle school youth group.

As I recall it, Major Tinker said that he and a friend were at a traveling tea museum in England and noticed a sign that read “Tea Duelling is strictly forbidden.” Of course, this raised the question: “What is tea duelling?” The two men decided the intriguing sign needed to have a real sport behind it. They came up with this:

If you are going to duel properly, you should acquaint yourself with the rules of the sport. When I give a short explanation of duelling to others, I say that the opponents dunk their biscuits in the tea to the count of five, and then each tries to be the last person to achieve a “clean nom.” A clean nom involves getting all of the biscuit into your mouth in one bite without it crumbling and landing in your tea, on the table (or floor), or on your person. Note that there is an important bit of information missing from the official rules: how much of the biscuit should be submersed in the tea. I’ve heard anything from one half of the biscuit to three-quarters of it. When I serve as Pot Mistress, I ask duellists to dunk at least three-quarters of their biscuit in their tea.

The founders came up with a selection of approved biscuits for duellists in the U.K.; in the United States, we have one official choice: Pepperidge Farm Chessmen. The cookies should be displayed face down, so that the duellists don’t pick a biscuit based on the image on it. Although I do not know of any testing that proves this, some images might “work” better than others. If neither duellist can see the images, they have equal chances of picking a “good” or “bad” biscuit.

Someone with gluten intolerance once asked me about gluten-free biscuits, and I ran the question by the founder of the American Tea Dueling Society. She suggested that gluten-free biscuits could be provided, but the duellists must always have the same kind of biscuit so that neither has an advantage over the other.

While a proper duel consists of, at a minimum, the duellists and Pot Master or Mistress, you can always informally duel with a friend. It’s also perfectly acceptable to practice alone for future duels. Rumor has it that the cookie calories don’t count when consumed during a practice session.

This week, challenge a friend to a duel over a couple of cups of tea and some biscuits!

Categories
Something Wonderful

Something Wonderful: Thomas Sanders’ Vines

Thomas Sanders' Vines are family-friendly

My teenager, who loves to show me her favorite Vines, was the first one to let me know that Twitter is shutting Vine down.

While some businesses used Vine in an attempt to reach their audiences, it was really a place for people to share six-second stories and short, funny skits. Like other social media channels, Vine made some of its best contributors famous — among them, Thomas Sanders. (You’ll notice that Sanders prominently displays the address of his YouTube channel next to his profile picture on Vine.)

There are plenty of talented, funny Viners, but one of the things that I particularly appreciate about Sanders is the mostly family-friendly nature of his Vines; I’ve seen many of them now, and they don’t seem to get any dirtier than the brief flash of the middle finger in this Vine. While I don’t cringe at the occasional profanity or sexual reference (otherwise, I wouldn’t listen to Bruce Cockburn), many Vines are things that I wouldn’t share with children or even with some of my friends. Sanders’ work is refreshing.

Many Viners do variations on a theme, such as Jus Reign’s “Gotta Be More Careful” series (including this Vine and this one), but Sanders specializes in them. Among his themes are “Narrating People’s Lives,” “Misleading Compliments,” and pranks on his friends inspired by either Disney or Pokemon. Some of the pranks are a little more than I could take if I were one of his friends, but I love his Peter Pan-inspired prank. He often plays a dad, a teacher, or a prince.

Occasionally, Sanders uses humor as social commentary. He’s covered platonic friendships between men and women, stress in schools, and strict dress codes for girls. But most of his Vines are just silly fun as he plays Ant-Man, an introvert at a party, a man who rescues a dog, a drama geek in a history class, and a cat… and those are only some of the Vines I wanted to link to in this post!

This week, take a break and indulge in some of Thomas Sanders’ Vines. Vine may be going away, but I have a feeling Sanders will do just fine without it.